Sprawa tygodnia
Archive of Censorship in Polish art (1989-2008)
![]() Katarzyna Kozyra „Blood Ties" Over 90 cases of censorship in Polish art. A calendar of interventions and violations of Article 73 of the Polish Constitution in 1989 – 2008.
Read more Indeks 73 Initative is supported by KulturaMiejska Association in Gdansk.
thanks to the funding from:
This website was made thanks to European Union funding within the frame of "Raising social awareness and strengthening of advocacy" program. The information contained in this website does not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the European Union. |
News
2009-02-25 | Petition against censoring David Černy's Entropa. Summary of Indeks 73 actions
On January 20, 2009, David Černy's installation Entropa. Stereotypes are barriers to be demolished was censored. The government of Bulgaria demanded to remove or cover the presentation of Bulgaria as a Turkish squat toilet. Entropa was created to mark the occasion of Czech presidency of the European Union. At the launch of the installation the Czech Deputy Prime Minister Alexandr Vondra stated that “twenty years after the fall of the Iron Curtain there is no place for censorship in Europe”. A few days later it turned out how wrong he had been – the art work in the building of the Council of Europe was covered with a black cloth. In the democratic (?) Union discussion was replaced with censorship... Even Culture Action Europe in Brussels, one of the most significant networks in the domain of cultural policies (sic!) refused to distribute information about the petition as they didn't want to get involved in the politically controversial affair. On January 26 Indeks 73 Initiative presented an international petition against this disgraceful act of censorship. During three weeks it was signed by 288 people from 19 countries (read a list of names), including many renowned activists, artists, lecturers, critics and other respresentatives of art and culture. Our protest was also supported by many citizens of Bulgaria, taking advantage of Entropa to criticise the current government in Sofia. Others showed understanding for offended Bulgarians, remembering unhealed wounds in Turkish-Bulgarian history. There have been opinions concerning an ethical aspect of David Černy's work, accusing him of abusing confidence of the Czech authorities, especially of the Deputy Prime Minister Aleksander Vondra, who had enthusiastically supported this controversial project. Indeks 73 petition also encountered some commentaries form culture-forming circles, questioning the purpose of the petition in defence of the censored artist. Zbigniew Libera points out that David Černy, in spite of his controversial works, is one of the most popular and frequently invited Czech artists in Europe. He earns a lot of money on his scandals and skilfully uses a game based on freedom of artistic expression restrictions. On Thursday, February 26, the petition was sent to the authorities in Sofia. The petition was supported by:
The petition evoked many interesting comments, for example: I share very much the concern about the obvious inability of the bulgarian authorities to deal with such an issue in an competent way. Unfortunately the president (and others) have shown this missing ability to enter into discussion instead of heating up nationalistic feelings already too often. I hope Bulgaria will one day be confident enough to face such "provocations" in an adult way. (Simone Boecker)
Indeks 73 has received loads of emails concerning the protest against censoring Černy's work. Some of them express words of support, others – quite the contrary. We would like to thank for all of them. You can read them online in section Letters to Indeks 73. It's worth quoting a few:YES for artistic expression.NOT for political dictatorship.Yes for self-criticism and self -irony.Not for restrictions and secretion of ploblems. (Alla Georgieva) A piece of art is a channel of expressing the feelings and thoughts of an artist. Instead of acusing we have to reflect and to think why somebody sees us as a toilet. The art should provoke more self-reflection than anger. (Ivan Davidov) In my opinion there is no problem, as Art is not an issue here. Fortunately...
Our action was discribed in foreign media, for example Prague Monitor. Unfortunately Polish media failed to tackle the matter, probably in fear of a controversial subject.(hanseatica) (...) I must tell you that I like David Cerny's installations. However, his "Turkish Toilet" was insulting for any Bulgarian. Would you support it if Poland had been represented as a "Russian Toilet"? Having said that, I wouldn't like to see it covered, destroyed etc. It just happens to be in the wrong place. Why not move it to the House of Humour and Satire in Gabrovo? (Vladimir Dvoretzky, Sofia) Covering and leaving is more ridiculous than removing and throwing out (Bronisław Tumiłowicz) Our petition also provoked a Bulgarian artist called Petko Stoyanov, indignant with Černy's work and our lack of understanding for other offended Bulgarians, who prepared his own version of Entropa. We appreciate his voice, which shows one can raise an objection to an art work in a different way than by means of censorship, but by enetering the dialogue with the Czech artist. | Report censorship.
We check provided information and preserve the informer's anonymity. Indeks 73 News Join Indeks 73 on: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| About Indeks 73| Contact Indeks 73